<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ob/Gyn Notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danilatos.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danilatos.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 23:29:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='danilatos.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://danilatos.wordpress.com/osd.xml" title="Ob/Gyn Notes" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://danilatos.wordpress.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>Preeclampsia</title>
		<link>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/preeclampsia/</link>
		<comments>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/preeclampsia/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 23:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danilatos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danilatos.wordpress.com/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Preeclampsia Zina Semenovskaya, MD, Resident Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York Downstate Medical Center College of Medicine Mert Erogul, MD, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Brooklyn: Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center Updated: May 27, 2010 Introduction Background Preeclampsia is a [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=danilatos.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3927841&amp;post=95&amp;subd=danilatos&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Preeclampsia</h1>
<p id="authors"><strong>Zina  Semenovskaya, MD,</strong> Resident Physician, Department of Emergency  Medicine, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York Downstate  Medical Center College of Medicine<br />
<strong>Mert Erogul, MD,</strong> Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of  Brooklyn: Consulting Staff, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings  County Hospital Center</p>
<p id="postingdate">Updated: May 27, 2010</p>
<div id="articlecontent">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p><a id="Introduction" name="Introduction"> </a></p>
<h3>Background</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionBackground" name="IntroductionBackground"> </a>Preeclampsia is a disorder of widespread vascular endothelial  malfunction and vasospasm that occurs after 20 weeks&#8217; gestation and can  present as late as 4-6 weeks postpartum. It is clinically defined  by hypertension and proteinuria, with or without pathologic edema.<span id="more-95"></span></p>
<p>Preeclampsia  is part of a spectrum of hypertensive disorders that complicate  pregnancy. These include chronic hypertension, preeclampsia superimposed  on chronic hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and  eclampsia. Although each of these disorders can appear in isolation,  they are thought of as progressive manifestations of a single process  and are believed to share a common etiology.</p>
<p>The diagnostic  criteria for preeclampsia focus on measurement of elevated blood  pressure and proteinuria that develop after 20 weeks&#8217; gestation. This  must be differentiated from gestational hypertension, which is more  common and may present with symptoms similar to preeclampsia, including  epigastric discomfort or thrombocytopenia, but is not characterized by  proteinuria. Additionally, patients with preexisting chronic  hypertension may present with superimposed preeclampsia presenting as  new-onset proteinuria after 20 weeks&#8217; gestation.</p>
<p>Consensus is  lacking among the various national and international organizations about  the values that define the disorder, but a reasonable limit in a woman  who was normotensive prior to 20 weeks&#8217; gestation is a systolic blood  pressure (BP) greater than 140 mm Hg and a diastolic BP greater than 90  mm Hg on 2 successive measurements 4-6 hours apart. Preeclampsia in a  patient with preexisting essential hypertension is diagnosed if systolic  BP has increased by 30 mm Hg or if diastolic BP has increased by 15 mm  Hg.</p>
<p>Proteinuria is defined as 300 mg or more of protein in a  24-hour urine sample. In the emergency department, a urine  protein-to-creatinine ratio of 0.19 or greater is somewhat predictive of  significant proteinuria (negative predictive value [NPV], 87%).<sup>[1 ]</sup>Serial  confirmations 6 hours apart increase the predictive value. Although  more convenient, a urine dipstick value of 1+ or more (30 mg/dL) is not  reliable.</p>
<p>For the purposes of guiding management, a distinction  can be made between mild preeclampsia and severe preeclampsia.</p>
<p>Diagnostic  criteria for severe preeclampsia include at least one of the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Systolic  BP greater than 160 mm Hg or diastolic BP greater than 110 mm Hg on 2  occasions 6 hours apart with the patient at bed rest</li>
<li>Proteinuria  greater than 5000 mg in a 24-hour collection or more than 3+ on 2  random urine samples collected at least 4 hours apart</li>
<li>Oliguria  with less than 500 mL per 24 hours</li>
<li>Persistent maternal headache  or visual disturbance</li>
<li>Pulmonary edema or cyanosis</li>
<li>Concerning  abdominal pain</li>
<li>Impaired liver function test findings</li>
<li>Thrombocytopenia</li>
<li>Oligohydramnios,  decreased fetal growth, or placental abruption</li>
</ul>
<p>Eclampsia  is defined as seizures in a patient with preeclampsia.</p>
<p>For more  information, see Medscape&#8217;s Pregnancy Resource Center</p>
<h3>Pathophysiology</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionPathophysiology" name="IntroductionPathophysiology"> </a>The mechanism by  which preeclampsia occurs is not certain, and a number of maternal,  paternal, and fetal factors have been implicated in its development. The  factors currently considered to be the most important include abnormal  placental implantation; maternal immunological intolerance;  cardiovascular and inflammatory changes; and genetic, nutritional, and  environmental factors.<sup>[2 ]</sup></p>
<p>Placental implantation with  abnormal trophoblastic invasion of uterine vessels is a major cause of  hypertension associated with the preeclampsia syndrome.<sup>[3 ]</sup>Normally,  uterine invasion by endovascular trophoblasts cause extensive  remodeling of uterine spiral arteries, resulting in enlarged vessel  diameter. In preeclampsia, there is only shallow invasion, and the  deeper uterine arterioles do not widen appropriately. Studies have shown  that the degree of incomplete trophoblastic invasion of the spiral  arteries is directly correlated with the severity of subsequent maternal  hypertension. Subsequently, the resulting placental hypoperfusion leads  by an unclear pathway to the release of systemic vasoactive compounds  that cause an exaggerated inflammatory response, vasoconstriction,  endothelial damage, capillary leak, hypercoagulability, and platelet  dysfunction, all of which contribute to organ dysfunction and the  various clinical features of the disease.</p>
<p>Immunological factors  have long been considered to be key players in preeclampsia. One  important component is a poorly understood dysregulation of maternal  tolerance to paternally derived placental and fetal antigens.<sup>[4 ]</sup>This  maternal-fetal immune maladaptation is characterized by defective  cooperation between uterine natural killer (NK) cells and fetal HLA-C,  and results in histological changes similar to those seen in acute graft  rejection. The endothelial cell dysfunction that is characteristic of  preeclampsia may be partially due to an extreme activation of leukocytes  in the maternal circulation, as evidenced by an upregulation of type 1  helper T cells.</p>
<p>Genetics have long been understood to play an  important role, and preeclampsia has been shown to involve multiple  genes. Importantly, the risk of preeclampsia is positively correlated  between close relatives; a recent study showed that 20-40% of daughters  and 11-37% of sisters of preeclamptic women also develop preeclampsia.<sup>[4  ]</sup>Twin studies have also shown a high correlation, approaching  40%. Over a hundred maternal and paternal genes have been studied for  their association with the syndrome, including those known to play a  role in vascular diseases, blood pressure regulation, diabetes, and  immunological functions. Because preeclampsia is genetically and  phenotypically a complex disease, it is unlikely that any one gene will  be shown to play a dominant role in its development.</p>
<h3>Frequency</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionFrequency" name="IntroductionFrequency"> </a></p>
<h4>United States</h4>
<p><a id="IntroductionFrequencyUnitedStates" name="IntroductionFrequencyUnitedStates"> </a>Preeclampsia  occurs in approximately 5-7% of all pregnancies. The incidence of  preeclampsia is 23.6 cases per 1,000 deliveries in the United States.  The incidence of eclampsia is estimated to be 1 in 2000 deliveries.</p>
<h4>International</h4>
<p><a id="IntroductionFrequencyInternational" name="IntroductionFrequencyInternational"> </a>The global  incidence of preeclampsia has been estimated at 5-14% of all  pregnancies. In developing countries, hypertensive disorders were the  second most common obstetrical cause of stillbirths and early neonatal  deaths, accounting for 23.6%.<sup>[5 ]</sup></p>
<h3>Mortality/Morbidity</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionMortalityMorbidity" name="IntroductionMortalityMorbidity"> </a>Preeclampsia is  the third leading pregnancy-related cause of death, after hemorrhage and  embolism. Preeclampsia is the cause in an estimated 790 maternal deaths  per 100,000 live births.</p>
<p>Morbidity and mortality is related to  systemic endothelial dysfunction; vasospasm and small-vessel thrombosis  leading to tissue and organ ischemia; CNS events such as seizures,  strokes, and hemorrhage; acute tubular necrosis; coagulopathies; and  placental abruption in the mother.</p>
<p>Hemolysis, elevated liver  enzyme levels, and low platelets (HELLP) syndrome may be an outcome of  severe preeclampsia, although some authors believe it to have an  unrelated etiology.</p>
<p>In the fetus, ischemic encephalopathy, growth  retardation, and the various sequelae of premature birth can occur.</p>
<h3>Race</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionRace" name="IntroductionRace"> </a>The frequency of mortality  differs among race and ethnicity, with African Americans having a worse  mortality rate than white women.</p>
<h3>Age</h3>
<p><a id="IntroductionAge" name="IntroductionAge"> </a>Preeclampsia  occurs more frequently in women at the extremes of reproductive age.</p>
<ul>
<li>Younger women (&lt;20 y) have a slightly increased risk.  Primigravid patients in particular seem to be predisposed.</li>
<li>Older  women (&gt;35 y) have a markedly increased risk.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Clinical</h2>
<p><a id="Clinical" name="Clinical"> </a></p>
<h3>History</h3>
<p><a id="ClinicalHistory" name="ClinicalHistory"> </a>Mild-to-moderate  preeclampsia may be asymptomatic. Many cases are detected through  routine prenatal screening. Patients with severe preeclampsia display  end-organ effects and may complain of the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>CNS
<ul>
<li>Headache</li>
<li>Visual  disturbances &#8211; Blurred, scintillating scotomata</li>
<li>Altered mental  status</li>
<li>Blindness &#8211; May be cortical<sup>[6 ]</sup>or retinal</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Dyspnea</li>
<li>Edema:  This exists in many pregnant women but sudden increase in edema or  facial edema is more concerning for preeclampsia. The edema of  preeclampsia occurs by a distinct mechanism that is similar to that of  angioneurotic edema.</li>
<li>Epigastric or right upper quadrant (RUQ)  abdominal pain: Hepatic involvement occurs in 10% of women with severe  preeclampsia. This pain is frequently accompanied by elevated serum  hepatic transaminase levels.</li>
<li>Weakness or malaise: This may be  evidence of hemolytic anemia.</li>
</ul>
<p>Preeclampsia in a prior  pregnancy is strongly associated with recurrence in subsequent  pregnancies. A history of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia  should strongly raise clinical suspicion. Uncommonly, patients can have  antepartum preeclampsia treated with delivery that then recurs in the  postpartum period.<sup>[7 ]</sup>Although this is highly unusual,  recurrent preeclampsia does occur and should be considered in postpartum  patients who present with hypertension and proteinuria.</p>
<h3>Physical</h3>
<p><a id="ClinicalPhysical" name="ClinicalPhysical"> </a>Findings  on physical examination may include the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Increased  BP compared with the patient&#8217;s baseline or greater than 140/90 mm Hg</li>
<li>Altered  mental status</li>
<li>Decreased vision or scotomas</li>
<li>Papilledema</li>
<li>Epigastric  or RUQ abdominal tenderness</li>
<li>Peripheral edema: Edema can be  normal in pregnancy, and a gradual increase in dependent edema is not  necessarily ominous. However, a sudden increase in edema or swelling of  the face is more suggestive of preeclampsia and should be promptly  investigated.</li>
<li>Hyperreflexia or clonus: Although deep tendon  reflexes are more useful in assessing magnesium toxicity, the presence  of clonus may indicate an increased risk of convulsions.</li>
<li>Seizures</li>
<li>Focal  neurologic deficit</li>
</ul>
<h3>Causes</h3>
<p><a id="ClinicalCauses" name="ClinicalCauses"> </a></p>
<ul>
<li>Pregnancy-associated  risk factors
<ul>
<li>Chromosomal abnormalities</li>
<li>Hydatidiform mole</li>
<li>Multifetal  pregnancy: Incidence is increased in twin gestations but is unaffected  by their zygosity.</li>
<li>Oocyte donation or donor insemination</li>
<li>Urinary  tract infection</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Maternal-specific risk factors
<ul>
<li>Extremes  of age</li>
<li>Black race: In the United States, the incidence of  preeclampsia is 1.8% among white women and 3% in African Americans.</li>
<li>Family  history of preeclampsia</li>
<li>Nulliparity</li>
<li>Preeclampsia in a  previous pregnancy</li>
<li>Diabetes</li>
<li>Obesity: Body weight is  strongly correlated with progressively increased risk, ranging from 4.3%  for women with a BMI &lt;20 kg/m to 13.3% in those with a BMI &gt;35  kg/m. A United Kingdom study on obesity showed that 9% of extremely  obese women were preeclamptic compared with 2% of matched controls.<sup>[8  ]</sup></li>
<li>Chronic hypertension</li>
<li>Renal disease</li>
<li>Collagen  vascular disease</li>
<li>Antiphospholipid syndrome</li>
<li>Periodontal  disease<sup>[9 ]</sup></li>
<li>Vitamin D deficiency: One literature  review suggests that maternal vitamin D deficiency may increase the risk  of preeclampsia and fetal grown restriction.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Recent studies have suggested that smoking during pregnancy is  associated with a reduced risk of gestational hypertension and  preeclampsia; however, this is controversial.<sup>[10 ]</sup>Placenta  previa has also been correlated with a reduced risk of preeclampsia.</p>
<h2>Differential Diagnoses</h2>
<p><a id="Differentials" name="Differentials"> </a></p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Abdominal Trauma, Blunt</td>
<td>Ovarian  Torsion</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Abruptio Placentae</td>
<td>Pregnancy,  Eclampsia</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Aneurysm, Abdominal</td>
<td>Status  Epilepticus</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Appendicitis, Acute</td>
<td>Stroke,  Hemorrhagic</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Cholecystitis and Biliary  Colic</td>
<td>Stroke, Ischemic</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Cholelithiasis</td>
<td>Subarachnoid  Hemorrhage</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Congestive Heart Failure  and Pulmonary             Edema</td>
<td>Subdural Hematoma</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Domestic Violence</td>
<td>Thrombotic  Thrombocytopenic Purpura</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Early  Pregnancy Loss</td>
<td>Toxicity, Amphetamine</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Encephalitis</td>
<td>Toxicity, Sympathomimetic</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Headache, Tension</td>
<td>Toxicity, Thyroid  Hormone</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Hypertensive Emergencies</td>
<td>Transient  Ischemic Attack</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Hyperthyroidism,  Thyroid Storm, and Graves             Disease</td>
<td>Urinary Tract Infection, Female</td>
</tr>
<tr valign="top">
<td>Migraine Headache</td>
<td>Withdrawal Syndromes</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h2>Workup</h2>
<p><a id="Workup" name="Workup"> </a></p>
<h3>Laboratory Studies</h3>
<p><a id="WorkupLabStudies" name="WorkupLabStudies"> </a></p>
<ul>
<li>CBC count and peripheral  smear
<ul>
<li>Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (HELLP)</li>
<li>Thrombocytopenia  &lt;100,000</li>
<li>Hemoconcentration may occur in severe preeclampsia.</li>
<li>Schistocytes  on peripheral smear</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Liver function tests:  Transaminase levels are elevated from hepatocellular injury and in HELLP  syndrome.</li>
<li>Serum creatinine level: Levels are elevated due to  decreased intravascular volume and decreased glomerular filtration rate  (GFR).</li>
<li>Urinalysis
<ul>
<li>Proteinuria is one of the diagnostic  criteria for preeclampsia.</li>
<li>Significant proteinuria defining  preeclampsia is 300 mg or more of protein in a 24-hour urine sample.</li>
<li>Proteinuria  suggestive of preeclampsia is greater than or equal to 1+ protein on  urine dipstick or 300 mg/L or more on urine dipstick.</li>
<li>Microalbuminuria  and urine albumin: Creatinine ratios have been shown to have poor  clinical predictive values and should not be used.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Abnormal  coagulation profile: PT and aPTT are elevated.</li>
<li>Disseminated  intravascular coagulopathy testing will show fibrin split products and  decreased fibrinogen levels.</li>
<li>Uric acid
<ul>
<li>Hyperuricemia is  one of the earliest laboratory manifestations of preeclampsia. It has a  low sensitivity, ranging from 0-55%, but a relatively high specificity,  ranging from 77-95%.<sup>[11 ]</sup></li>
<li>Serial levels may be useful  to indicate disease progression.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Imaging  Studies</h3>
<p><a id="WorkupImagingStudies" name="WorkupImagingStudies"> </a></p>
<ul>
<li>Head CT: This study is  used to detect intracranial hemorrhage in selected patients with sudden  severe headaches, focal neurologic deficits, or seizures with a  prolonged post-ictal state.</li>
<li>Ultrasonography: This is used to  assess the status of the fetus as well as to evaluate for growth  restriction (typically asymmetrical — use abdominal circumference).  Aside from transabdominal ultrasonography, umbilical artery Doppler  ultrasonography should be performed to assess blood flow. The value of  Doppler ultrasonography in other fetal vessels has not been  demonstrated.</li>
<li>Cardiotocography: This is the standard fetal  nonstress test and the mainstay of fetal monitoring. Although it gives  continuing information about fetal well being, it has little predictive  value.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Other Tests</h3>
<p><a id="WorkupOtherTests" name="WorkupOtherTests"> </a>A study  at Yale University has shown preliminary results that Congo Red, a dye  currently used to locate atypical amyloid aggregates in Alzheimer&#8217;s  disease, may also be effective in the early diagnosis of preeclampsia.<sup>[12  ]</sup>This finding may lead to a spot urine test that can be used in  emergency departments and internationally, especially in resource-poor  countries where preeclampsia continues to be underdiagnosed and accounts  for a large percentage of maternal and fetal mortality.</p>
<h2>Treatment</h2>
<p><a id="Treatment" name="Treatment"> </a></p>
<h3>Prehospital  Care</h3>
<p><a id="TreatmentPrehospitalCare" name="TreatmentPrehospitalCare"> </a>Prehospital care for  pregnant patients with suspected preeclampsia includes the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Oxygen  via facemask</li>
<li>Intravenous access</li>
<li>Cardiac monitoring</li>
<li>Transportation  of patient in left lateral decubitus position</li>
<li>Seizure  precautions</li>
</ul>
<h3>Emergency Department Care</h3>
<p><a id="TreatmentEmergencyDepartmentCare" name="TreatmentEmergencyDepartmentCare"> </a>In the  emergency setting, control of BP and seizures should be priorities.  Definitive therapy is delivery of the fetus,<sup>[13 ]</sup>although  preeclampsia may paradoxically emerge in postpartum patients. In  general, the further the pregnancy is from term, the greater the impetus  to manage the patient medically.</p>
<p><strong>BP control </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The  goal is to lower BP to prevent cerebrovascular and cardiac  complications while maintaining uteroplacental blood flow.</li>
<li>Control  of mildly increased BP does not appear to improve perinatal morbidity  or mortality, and, in fact, it may reduce birth weight.</li>
<li>Antihypertensive  treatment is indicated for diastolic blood pressure above 105 mm Hg and  systolic pressure above 160 mm Hg, though patients with chronic  hypertension may tolerate higher values.</li>
<li>Patients with severe  preeclampsia who have BP below 160/105 mm Hg may benefit from  antihypertensives because of the possibility of unpredictable  acceleration of the disease and sudden increases in hypertension.</li>
<li>The  goal is to maintain diastolic blood pressure between 90 and 100 mm Hg  and systolic pressure between 140 and 155 mm Hg.</li>
<li>First-line  medications are labetalol, given orally or IV; nifedipine, given orally  or IV; or hydralazine IV. Doses are as noted below.</li>
<li>Atenolol,  ACE inhibitors, ARBs, and diuretics should be avoided.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Control  of seizures</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The basic principles of airway, breathing,  circulation (the ABCs) should always be followed as a general principle  of seizure management.</li>
<li>Active seizures should be treated with  intravenous magnesium sulfate as a first-line agent.<sup>[14,15 ]</sup>A  loading dose of 4 g should be given by an infusion pump over 5-10  minutes, followed by an infusion of 1 g/h maintained for 24 hours after  the last seizure. Recurrent seizures should be treated with an  additional bolus of 2 g or an increase in the infusion rate to 1.5 g or 2  g per hour.</li>
<li>Prophylactic treatment with magnesium sulfate is  indicated for all patients with severe preeclampsia.<sup>[14 ]</sup>No  consensus exists about whether patients with mild preeclampsia (elevated  blood pressure without evidence of end-organ damage) need to be on  magnesium seizure prophylaxis.</li>
<li>Magnesium levels, respiratory  rate, reflexes, and urine output must be monitored to detect magnesium  toxicity. Magnesium sulfate is mostly excreted in the urine, and  therefore urine output needs to be closely monitored. If urine output  falls below 20 mL/h, the magnesium infusion should be stopped. Magnesium  toxicity can be easily assessed by clinical examination; the first sign  of toxicity is often a loss of deep tendon reflexes, followed by  respiratory depression. If signs of toxicity are present, the magnesium  sulfate infusion should be stopped. Calcium gluconate 1 g (10 mL) can be  given over 10 minutes to reverse the effects.<sup>[11,16 ]</sup></li>
<li>Be  aware of the risk of seizures following delivery — up to 44% of  eclampsia cases have been reported to occur postnatally. This risk is  especially elevated 48 hours postpartum, but it can occur at any time up  to 4 weeks after delivery.<sup>[11 ]</sup></li>
<li>For seizure  refractory to magnesium sulfate therapy, benzodiazepines and/or  phenytoin may be considered.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Fluid management</strong><sup>[17  ]</sup></p>
<ul>
<li>Little clinical evidence exists in the published  literature on which to base decisions regarding the management of fluids  during preeclampsia. Currently, no prospective studies are available,  and guidelines are largely based on consensus and retrospective review.</li>
<li>Despite  the peripheral edema, patients with preeclampsia are intravascularly  volume depleted with high peripheral vascular resistance. Diuretics  should be avoided.</li>
<li>Aggressive volume resuscitation may lead to  pulmonary edema, which is a common cause of maternal morbidity and  mortality. Pulmonary edema occurs most frequently 48-72 hours  postpartum, probably due to mobilization of extravascular fluid. Because  volume expansion has no demonstrated benefit, patients should be fluid  restricted when possible, at least until the period of postpartum  diuresis.</li>
<li>Volume expansion has not been shown to reduce the  incidence of fetal distress and should be used judiciously, as  discussed.</li>
<li>Central venous or pulmonary artery pressure  monitoring may be indicated in critical cases. A central venous pressure  (CVP) of 5 mm Hg in women with no heart disease indicates sufficient  intravascular volume, and maintenance fluids alone are sufficient. Total  fluids should generally be limited to 80 mL/h or 1 mL/kg/h.</li>
<li>Careful  measurement of fluid input and output is advisable, particularly in the  immediate postpartum period. Many patients will have a brief (up to 6  h) period of oliguria following delivery; this should be anticipated and  not overcorrected.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Delivery</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Delivery  is the definitive treatment for antepartum preeclampsia. Obstetrical  consultation should be sought early to coordinate transfer to an  obstetrical floor, as appropriate.</li>
<li>Patients with mild  preeclampsia are often induced after 37 weeks&#8217; gestation. Prior to this,  the immature fetus is treated with expectant management with  corticosteroids to accelerate lung maturity in preparation for early  delivery.</li>
<li>In patients with severe preeclampsia, induction of  delivery should be considered after 34 weeks&#8217; gestation. In these cases,  the severity of disease must be weighed against the risks of  prematurity.</li>
<li>Eclampsia is common after delivery and has occurred  up to 6 weeks after delivery. Patients at risk for eclampsia should be  carefully monitored postpartum.<sup>[18 ]</sup>Additionally, patients  with preeclampsia successfully treated with delivery may present with  recurrent preeclampsia up to 4 weeks postpartum.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Consultations</h3>
<p><a id="TreatmentConsultations" name="TreatmentConsultations"> </a>Immediate obstetric consultation is warranted for all patients  who present with preeclampsia.</p>
<h2>Medication</h2>
<p><a id="Medication" name="Medication"> </a>Magnesium  sulfate is the first-line treatment of prevention of primary and  recurrent eclamptic seizures. For eclamptic seizures refractory to  magnesium sulfate, lorazepam and phenytoin may be used as second-line  agents.</p>
<p>In the setting of severe hypertension (systolic BP,  &gt;160 mm Hg; diastolic BP, &gt;110 mm Hg), antihypertensive treatment  is recommended. Antihypertensive treatment decreases the incidence of  cerebrovascular problems but does not alter the progression of  preeclampsia.</p>
<p>Traditionally, hydralazine has been used for control  of severe hypertension in women with preeclampsia. However, the  evidence regarding the side effects and maternal/fetal outcomes when  compared with labetalol and nifedipine is conflicting.</p>
<h3>Anticonvulsants</h3>
<p>Agents that inhibit smooth muscle contractions are used.</p>
<h4>Magnesium sulfate</h4>
<p>First-line  therapy for seizure prophylaxis. Antagonizes calcium channels of smooth  muscle. Indicated in severe preeclampsia, eclampsia, and preeclampsia in  the near term. Administer IV/IM for seizure prophylaxis in  preeclampsia. Use IV for quicker onset of action in true eclampsia.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>4-6 g IV over 20  min with maintenance of 1-2 g/h</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>Not established</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>Concurrent  use with nifedipine may cause hypotension and neuromuscular blockade;  may increase neuromuscular blockade seen with aminoglycosides and  potentiate neuromuscular blockade produced by tubocurarine, vecuronium,  and succinylcholine; may increase CNS effects and toxicity of CNS  depressants, betamethasone, and cardiotoxicity of ritodrine</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented hypersensitivity;  heart block; Addison disease; myocardial damage; severe hepatitis</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>A &#8211;  Fetal risk not revealed in controlled studies in humans</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>Magnesium sulfate may alter cardiac conduction leading to  heart block in digitalized patients; respiratory rate, deep tendon  reflex, and renal function should be monitored when electrolyte is  administered parenterally; caution when administering magnesium sulfate  dose since may produce significant hypotension or asystole; in overdose,  calcium gluconate, 10-20 mL IV of 10% solution, can be given as  antidote for clinically significant hypermagnesemia</p>
<h4>Lorazepam (Ativan)</h4>
<p>Sedative hypnotic  with short onset of effects and relatively long half-life. By increasing  the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which is a major  inhibitory neurotransmitter in the brain, may depress all levels of CNS,  including limbic and reticular formation.<br />
Important to monitor  patient&#8217;s blood pressure after administering dose. Adjust as necessary.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>4 mg/dose IV  slowly over 2-5 min and repeat in 10-15 min prn; cumulative dose of 8  mg/d typically considered maximum<br />
1-10 mg/d PO/IV/IM divided bid/tid</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>Infants and children: 0.1 mg/kg IV  slowly over 2-5 min; repeat prn in 10-15 min at 0.05 mg/kg; not to  exceed 4 mg/dose<br />
Adolescents: 0.07 mg/kg IV slowly over 2-5 min and  repeat in 10-15 min prn; not to exceed 4 mg/dose</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>Toxicity of benzodiazepines in CNS increases when used  concurrently with alcohol, phenothiazines, barbiturates, and MAO  inhibitors</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented  hypersensitivity; preexisting CNS depression, hypotension, and  narrow-angle glaucoma; reversal agents (eg, flumazenil) contraindicated  when lorazepam used for life-threatening conditions (eg, control of  intracranial pressure or status epilepticus)</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>D &#8211; Fetal risk shown in humans; use  only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>Caution in renal or hepatic impairment, myasthenia gravis,  organic brain syndrome, or Parkinson disease</p>
<h4>Phenytoin (Dilantin)</h4>
<p>Phenytoin has been  used successfully in eclamptic seizures, but cardiac monitoring is  required secondary to associated bradycardia and hypotension.<br />
Central  anticonvulsant effect of phenytoin is by stabilizing neuronal activity  by decreasing the ion flux across depolarizing membranes.<br />
Some  benefits to using phenytoin are that it can be continued orally for  several days until the risk of eclamptic seizures has subsided, it has  established therapeutic levels that are easily tested, and no known  neonatal adverse effects are associated with short-term usage.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>10 mg/kg loading  dose infused IV no faster than 50 mg/min, followed by maintenance dose  started 2 h later at 5 mg/kg</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>Administer  as in adults</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>Amiodarone,  benzodiazepines, chloramphenicol, cimetidine, fluconazole, isoniazid,  metronidazole, miconazole, phenylbutazone, succinimides, sulfonamides,  omeprazole, phenacemide, disulfiram, ethanol (acute ingestion),  trimethoprim, and valproic acid may increase phenytoin toxicity<br />
Phenytoin  effects may decrease when taken concurrently with barbiturates,  diazoxide, ethanol (chronic ingestion), rifampin, antacids, charcoal,  carbamazepine, theophylline, and sucralfate<br />
Phenytoin may decrease  effects of acetaminophen, corticosteroids, dicumarol, disopyramide,  doxycycline, estrogens, haloperidol, amiodarone, carbamazepine, cardiac  glycosides, quinidine, theophylline, methadone, metyrapone, mexiletine,  oral contraceptives, valproic acid</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented hypersensitivity; sinoatrial block; second- and  third-degree AV block; sinus bradycardia; Adams-Stokes syndrome</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>D &#8211;  Fetal risk shown in humans; use only if benefits outweigh risk to fetus</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>Perform blood counts and  urinalyses when therapy is begun and at monthly intervals for several  months thereafter to monitor for blood dyscrasias; discontinue use if a  rash appears, and do not resume use if rash is exfoliative, bullous, or  purpuric; rapid IV infusion may result in death from cardiac arrest,  marked by QRS widening; caution in acute intermittent porphyria and  diabetes (may elevate blood sugar levels); discontinue use if hepatic  dysfunction occurs</p>
<h3>Antihypertensives</h3>
<p>These  agents are used to decrease systemic resistance and to help reverse  uteroplacental insufficiency.</p>
<h4>Hydralazine  (Apresoline)</h4>
<p>First-line therapy against preeclamptic  hypertension. Decreases systemic resistance through direct vasodilation  of arterioles, resulting in reflex tachycardia. Reflex tachycardia and  resultant increased cardiac output helps reverse uteroplacental  insufficiency, a key concern when treating hypertension in a patient  with preeclampsia. Adverse effects to the fetus are uncommon.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>5-10 mg IV;  repeat q20min to maximum of 60 mg</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>Not established</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>MAO  inhibitors and beta-blockers may increase hydralazine toxicity;  pharmacologic effects of hydralazine may be decreased by indomethacin</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented hypersensitivity;  mitral valve rheumatic heart disease</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>C &#8211; Fetal risk revealed in studies  in animals but not established or not studied in humans; may use if  benefits outweigh risk to fetus</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>Hydralazine has been implicated in myocardial infarction;  caution in suspected coronary artery disease</p>
<h4>Labetalol (Normodyne)</h4>
<p>Second-line  therapy that produces vasodilatation and decreases in systemic vascular  resistance. Has alpha-1 and beta-antagonist effects and beta2-agonist  effects. Has more rapid onset than hydralazine and less overshoot  hypotension. Dosage and duration of labetalol is more variable. Adverse  effects to fetus are uncommon.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>50-100 mg IV; repeat q30min to a maximum of 300 mg</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>Not established</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>Decreases effect of diuretics and increases toxicity of  methotrexate, lithium, and salicylates; may diminish reflex tachycardia,  resulting from nitroglycerin use, without interfering with hypotensive  effects; cimetidine may increase labetalol blood levels; glutethimide  may decrease labetalol effects by inducing microsomal enzymes</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented hypersensitivity;  cardiogenic shock; pulmonary edema; bradycardia; atrioventricular block;  uncompensated congestive heart failure; reactive airway disease; severe  bradycardia</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>C &#8211; Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not  established or not studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk  to fetus</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>Caution in impaired  hepatic function; discontinue therapy if signs of liver dysfunction; in  elderly patients, a lower response rate and higher incidence of  toxicity may be observed</p>
<h4>Nifedipine  (Procardia)</h4>
<p>Relaxes coronary smooth muscle and produces  coronary vasodilation, which, in turn, improves myocardial oxygen  delivery. Sublingual administration is generally safe, despite  theoretical concerns.</p>
<h4>Dosing</h4>
<h5>Adult</h5>
<p>10-30 mg IR cap PO tid; not to exceed 120-180 mg/d<br />
30-60 mg  SR tab PO qd; not to exceed 90-120 mg/d</p>
<h5>Pediatric</h5>
<p>0.25-0.5 mg/kg/dose PO tid/qid prn</p>
<h4>Interactions</h4>
<p>Fentanyl and alcohol may increase hypotensive effects; calcium  channel blocker may increase cyclosporine levels; H2 blockers  (cimetidine), erythromycin, nafcillin, and azole antifungals may  increase toxicity (avoid combination or monitor closely); carbamazepine  may reduce bioavailability (avoid this combination); rifampin may  decrease levels (monitor and adjust dose of calcium channel blocker)</p>
<h4>Contraindications</h4>
<p>Documented hypersensitivity</p>
<h4>Precautions</h4>
<h5>Pregnancy</h5>
<p>C &#8211;  Fetal risk revealed in studies in animals but not established or not  studied in humans; may use if benefits outweigh risk to fetus</p>
<h5>Precautions</h5>
<p>May cause lower extremity edema;  allergic hepatitis has occurred but is rare</p>
<h2>Follow-up</h2>
<p><a id="Followup" name="Followup"> </a></p>
<h3>Further  Inpatient Care</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupFurtherInpatientCare" name="FollowupFurtherInpatientCare"> </a>Hospitalization is  indicated for all women with severe preeclampsia. The goals of  hospitalization include the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Daily  weigh-ins</li>
<li>Blood pressure readings every 4 hours</li>
<li>Prophylactic  anticonvulsive therapy</li>
<li>Corticosteroids to enhance fetal lung  maturity</li>
</ul>
<h3>Further Outpatient Care</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupFurtherOutpatientCare" name="FollowupFurtherOutpatientCare"> </a>Outpatient management of preeclampsia has a limited  role. The decision to treat on an outpatient basis must be made in  consultation with an obstetrician. Detailed instructions on signs and  symptoms of progression of disease, including headache, visual changes,  abdominal pain, vaginal bleeding, or decreased fetal movement, as well  as strict bed rest is recommended.</p>
<h3>Transfer</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupTransfer" name="FollowupTransfer"> </a>Patients  with severe preeclampsia must be stabilized in the ED as much as  possible prior to transfer to a tertiary care facility.</p>
<h3>Complications</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupComplications" name="FollowupComplications"> </a>Complications of preeclampsia may include the following:</p>
<ul>
<li>Abruptio placentae with disseminated intravascular  coagulopathy</li>
<li>Renal insufficiency or failure</li>
<li>Hemolysis,  elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet count (or HELLP syndrome)</li>
<li>Eclampsia</li>
<li>Cerebral  hemorrhage</li>
<li>Maternal death and/or fetal demise</li>
</ul>
<h3>Prognosis</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupPrognosis" name="FollowupPrognosis"> </a></p>
<ul>
<li>Early detection and  frequent obstetric assessment markedly improves prognosis.</li>
<li>A  history of preeclampsia increases a woman&#8217;s subsequent risk of vascular  disease, including hypertension, thrombosis, ischemic heart disease,  myocardial infarction, and stroke.<sup>[19 ]</sup></li>
</ul>
<h3>Patient  Education</h3>
<p><a id="FollowupPatientEducation" name="FollowupPatientEducation"> </a>For excellent patient  education resources, visit eMedicine&#8217;s Pregnancy and Reproduction Center  and Circulatory Problems Center. Also, see eMedicine&#8217;s patient  education articles Pregnancy and High Blood Pressure.</p>
<h2>Miscellaneous</h2>
<p><a id="Miscellaneous" name="Miscellaneous"> </a></p>
<h3>Medicolegal  Pitfalls</h3>
<p><a id="MiscellaneousMedicalLegalPitfalls" name="MiscellaneousMedicalLegalPitfalls"> </a></p>
<ul>
<li>Immediate  obstetric consultation is required for all patients who present with  preeclampsia.</li>
<li>Maintain a high index of suspicion for  preeclampsia when evaluating any complaint in a pregnant patient with  abnormally elevated BP.</li>
<li>Any pregnant patient, regardless of age,  is at risk for preeclampsia.</li>
</ul>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol>
<li>Rodriguez-Thompson D, Lieberman ES. Use of a random  urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio for the diagnosis of significant  proteinuria during pregnancy. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. Oct 2001;185(4):808-11. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/11641656">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Cunningham  FG, Veno KJ, Bloom SL, et al. Pregnancy Hypertension. In: <em>Williams  Obstetrics</em>. 23e. 2010:<a href="http://www.accessmedicine.com/resourceTOC.aspx?resourceID=46">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Zhou  Y, Damsky CH, Fisher SJ. Preeclampsia is associated with failure of  human cytotrophoblasts to mimic a vascular adhesion phenotype. One cause  of defective endovascular invasion in this syndrome?. <em>J Clin Invest</em>. May  1 1997;99(9):2152-64. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9151787">[Medline]</a>. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC508045/">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Madejczyk  M, Kruszynski G, Breborowicz G. Etiopathology of preeclampsia. <em>Arch  Perinat Med</em>. 2009;15(3):144-151. <a href="http://www.ptmp.pl/archives/apm/15-3/APM153-3-Madejczyk.pdf">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Ngoc  NT, Merialdi M, Abdel-Aleem H, Carroli G, Purwar M, Zavaleta N, et  al. Causes of stillbirths and early neonatal deaths: data from 7993  pregnancies in six developing countries. <em>Bull World Health Organ</em>. Sep 2006;84(9):699-705. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/17128339">[Medline]</a>. <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2627466/">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Llovera  I, Roit Z, Johnson A, Sherman L. Cortical blindness, a rare  complication of pre-eclampsia. <em>J Emerg Med</em>. Oct 2005;29(3):295-7. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16183449">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Andrus  SS, Wolfson AB. Postpartum preeclampsia occurring after resolution of  antepartum preeclampsia. <em>J Emerg Med</em>. Feb 2010;38(2):168-70. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/18547773">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Knight  M, Kurinczuk JJ, Spark P, Brocklehurst P. Extreme obesity in pregnancy  in the United Kingdom. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. May 2010;115(5):989-97. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/20410773">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>[Best  Evidence] Conde-Agudelo A, Villar J, Lindheimer M. Maternal infection  and risk of preeclampsia: systematic review and metaanalysis. <em>Am J  Obstet Gynecol</em>. Jan 2008;198(1):7-22. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/18166297">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Wikstrom  AK, Stephansson O, Cnattingius S. Tobacco use during pregnancy and  preeclampsia risk: effects of cigarette smoking and snuff. <em>Hypertension</em>. May 2010;55(5):1254-9. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/20231527">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>[Guideline]  Tuffnell DJ, Shennan AH, Waugh JJ, Walker JJ. Royal College of  Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of severe  pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. 2006. <a href="http://guideline.gov/summary/summary.aspx?doc_id=9397">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Larson,  NF. Congo Red Dot Urine Test Can Predict, Diagnose  Preeclampsia. Medscape Medical News. Available at <a href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/716741?src=rss" target="_blank">http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/716741?src=rss</a>. Accessed  Apr 22, 2010.</li>
<li>Wagner LK. Diagnosis and management of  preeclampsia. <em>Am Fam Physician</em>. Dec 15 2004;70(12):2317-24. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15617295">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Lew  M, Klonis E. Emergency management of eclampsia and severe  pre-eclampsia. <em>Emerg Med (Fremantle)</em>. Aug 2003;15(4):361-8. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/14631704">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>McCoy  S, Baldwin K. Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of  preeclampsia. <em>Am J Health Syst Pharm</em>. Feb 15 2009;66(4):337-44. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/19202042">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Lindheimer  MD, Taler SJ, Cunningham FG. Hypertension in pregnancy. <em>J Am Soc  Hypertens</em>. April 2010;4(2):68-78. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/20400051">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Engelhardt  T, MacLennan FM. Fluid management in pre-eclampsia. <em>Int J Obstet  Anesth</em>. Oct 1999;8(4):253-9. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15321120">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Yancey  LM, Withers E, Bakes K, Abbott J. Postpartum preeclampsia: Emergency  department presentation and management. <em>J Emerg Med</em>. Sep 22 2008;<a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/18814997">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>[Best  Evidence] Bellamy L, Casas JP, Hingorani AD, Williams DJ. Pre-eclampsia  and risk of cardiovascular disease and cancer in later life: systematic  review and meta-analysis. <em>BMJ</em>. Nov 10 2007;335(7627):974. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/17975258">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Doan-Wiggins  L. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. <em>Emerg Med Clin North Am</em>. Aug 1987;5(3):495-508. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/3308427">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Frakes  MA, Richardson LE 2nd. Magnesium sulfate therapy in certain emergency  conditions. <em>Am J Emerg Med</em>. Mar 1997;15(2):182-7. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9115526">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Lipstein  H, Lee CC, Crupi RS. A current concept of eclampsia. <em>Am J Emerg Med</em>. May 2003;21(3):223-6. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/12811718">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Ogle  ME, Sanders AB. Preeclampsia. <em>Ann Emerg Med</em>. May 1984;13(5):368-70. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/6711936">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Powers  DR, Papadakos PJ, Wallin JD. Parenteral hydralazine revisited. <em>J  Emerg Med</em>. Mar-Apr 1998;16(2):191-6. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9543400">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Probst  BD. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. <em>Emerg Med Clin North Am</em>. Feb 1994;12(1):73-89. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/8306938">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Sibai  B, Dekker G, Kupferminc M. Pre-eclampsia. <em>Lancet</em>. Feb 26-Mar  4 2005;365(9461):785-99. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15733721">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Witlin  AG, Sibai BM. Magnesium sulfate therapy in preeclampsia and eclampsia. <em>Obstet  Gynecol</em>. Nov 1998;92(5):883-9. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9794688">[Medline]</a>.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Keywords</h2>
<p>preeclampsia,  preeclampsia treatment, preeclampsia diagnosis, preeclampsia symptoms,  preeclampsia causes, hypertensive disease in pregnancy,  pregnancy-induced hypertension, toxemia of pregnancy, hypertension,  proteinuria, eclampsia, seizure in pregnancy, microangiopathic hemolytic  anemia, HELLP syndrome</p>
<h2>Contributor Information and  Disclosures</h2>
<h4>Author</h4>
<p><strong>Zina  Semenovskaya, MD,</strong> Resident Physician, Department of Emergency  Medicine, Kings County Hospital, State University of New York Downstate  Medical Center College of Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Coauthor(s)</h4>
<p><strong>Mert Erogul, MD,</strong> Assistant Professor of  Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Brooklyn: Consulting Staff,  Department of Emergency Medicine, Kings County Hospital Center<br />
Mert  Erogul, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American  College of Emergency Physicians, American Medical Association, and  Society for Academic Emergency Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Medical Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Assaad J Sayah, MD,</strong> Chief, Department of  Emergency Medicine, Cambridge Health Alliance<br />
Assaad J Sayah, MD is a  member of the following medical societies: National Association of EMS  Physicians<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Pharmacy Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD,</strong> Senior  Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine<br />
Disclosure: eMedicine Salary Employment</p>
<h4>Managing  Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Mark Zwanger, MD, MBA,</strong> Assistant  Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Thomas Jefferson  University<br />
Mark Zwanger, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical  societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of  Emergency Physicians, and American Medical Association<br />
Disclosure: Pfizer Salary Employment</p>
<h4>CME Editor</h4>
<p><strong>John D Halamka, MD, MS,</strong> Associate Professor  of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical  Center; Chief Information Officer, CareGroup Healthcare System and  Harvard Medical School; Attending Physician, Division of Emergency  Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center<br />
John D Halamka, MD, MS  is a member of the following medical societies: American College of  Emergency Physicians, American Medical Informatics Association, Phi Beta  Kappa, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Chief Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Pamela L Dyne, MD,</strong> Professor of Clinical  Medicine/Emergency Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA;  Attending Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Olive View-UCLA  Medical Center<br />
Pamela L Dyne, MD is a member of the following medical  societies: American Academy of Emergency Medicine, American College of  Emergency Physicians, and Society for Academic Emergency Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
</div>
<div id="legaltextsection"><strong> Acknowledgments </strong><a id="Acknowledgments" name="Acknowledgments"> </a></p>
<p>The authors and  editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the contributions of  previous author, Dawn C Jung, MD, to the development and writing of this  article.</p>
<p><strong> Further Reading</strong><a id="FurtherReading" name="FurtherReading"> </a></p>
<p>The Geneva  Foundation for Medical Education and Research has published a list of  international links relevant to the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment  of hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia in pregnancy.</p>
<p>The  World Health Organization has published guidelines on the management of  preeclampsia and eclampsia that is especially useful for midwives and  other mid-level providers and can be extrapolated for use in the  developing world. It is available in English and Portuguese.</p>
<p><!-- FOOTER--> <!-- Copyright --></p>
<p id="printcopyright">© 1994-// 2010  by Medscape.<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)</p>
</div>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/danilatos.wordpress.com/95/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=danilatos.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3927841&amp;post=95&amp;subd=danilatos&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/preeclampsia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2de800085768360616818c26420217fd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">danilatos</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pregnancy Diagnosis</title>
		<link>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/pregnancy-diagnosis/</link>
		<comments>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/pregnancy-diagnosis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>danilatos</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Obstetrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danilatos.wordpress.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pregnancy Diagnosis Andrea D Shields, MD, Director, Antenatal Counseling and Diagnostic Center, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Wilford Hall Medical Center; Associate Faculty, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Updated: Apr 20, 2009 Introduction The diagnosis of pregnancy requires a multifaceted approach using 3 main diagnostic tools. These are history [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=danilatos.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3927841&amp;post=89&amp;subd=danilatos&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>Pregnancy Diagnosis</h1>
<p id="authors"><strong>Andrea D Shields, MD,</strong> Director, Antenatal  Counseling and Diagnostic Center, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine,  Wilford Hall Medical Center; Associate Faculty, Department of  Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health  Sciences</p>
<p id="postingdate">Updated: Apr 20, 2009</p>
<div id="articlecontent">
<h2>Introduction</h2>
<p><a id="Introduction" name="Introduction"> </a>The diagnosis of  pregnancy requires a multifaceted approach using 3 main diagnostic  tools. These are history and physical examination, laboratory  evaluation, and ultrasonography. Currently, physicians may use all of  these tools to diagnose pregnancy at early gestation and to help rule  out other pathologies.<span id="more-89"></span></p>
<h2>History and Physical Examination</h2>
<p><a id="HistoryandPhysicalExamination" name="HistoryandPhysicalExamination"> </a>The diagnosis of  pregnancy has traditionally been made based on history and physical  examination findings. Important aspects of the menstrual history must be  obtained. The woman should describe her usual menstrual pattern,  including date of onset of last menses, duration, flow, and frequency.  Items that may confuse the diagnosis of early pregnancy are an atypical  last menstrual period, contraceptive use, and a history of irregular  menses. Additionally, as many as 25% of women bleed during their first  trimester, further complicating the assessment.<sup>[1 ]</sup></p>
<p>Be  alert for rising human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels, an empty  uterus observed on sonogram, abdominal pain, and vaginal bleeding  because these may signal an ectopic pregnancy.<sup>[2,3 ]</sup>Ectopic  pregnancies are the primary cause of first trimester maternal mortality  and should be diagnosed early, before the pregnancy ruptures or the  patient becomes unstable (see Media file 1).<sup>[4 ]</sup></p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2477.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex m..." width="800" height="616" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Pregnancy  diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex     mass in the adnexa (labeled EP). It was found to be an ectopic     pregnancy at the time of surgery.</h4>
<p>Other historical  factors related to ectopic pregnancies include prior tubal manipulation,  pelvic inflammatory disease, previous ectopic pregnancy, tubal disease,  use of an intrauterine device for contraception, fertility therapies,  and tubal ligation.<sup>[3,5,6 ]</sup>See Ectopic Pregnancy for a full  description and details.The classic presentation of pregnancy is a  woman with menses of regular frequency who presents with amenorrhea,  nausea, vomiting, generalized malaise, and breast tenderness.</p>
<p>Upon  physical examination, one may find an enlarged uterus after bimanual  examination, breast changes, and softening and enlargement of the cervix  (Hegar sign; observed at approximately 6 wk). The Chadwick sign is a  bluish discoloration of the cervix from venous congestion and can be  observed by 8-10 weeks. A gravid uterus may be palpable low in the  abdomen if the pregnancy has progressed far enough, usually by 12 weeks.  Currently, through the use of chemical assays and ultrasonography,  physicians are capable of making the diagnosis of pregnancy before many  of the physical signs and symptoms are evident.<sup>[7 ]</sup></p>
<h2>Laboratory Evaluation</h2>
<p><a id="LaboratoryEvaluation" name="LaboratoryEvaluation"> </a>Several hormones can be  measured and monitored to aid in the diagnosis of pregnancy. The most  commonly used assays are for the beta subunit of hCG. Other hormones  that have been used include progesterone and early pregnancy factor.</p>
<p>The  cytotrophoblast and syncytiotrophoblast each secrete a variety of  hormones that include, but are not limited to, corticotropin-releasing  hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, thyrotropin-releasing hormone,  somatostatin, corticotropin, human chorionic thyrotropin, human  placental lactogen, inhibin/activin, transforming growth factor-beta,  insulinlike growth factors 1 and 2, epidermal growth factor,  pregnancy-specific beta-1 glycoprotein, placental protein 5, and  pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. To date, no commercially feasible  tests that use these hormones have been made available to aid in the  diagnosis of pregnancy.</p>
<p><strong>Beta-human chorionic  gonadotropin</strong></p>
<p>hCG is a glycoprotein similar in structure to  follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and  thyrotropin. hCG is composed of alpha and beta subunits. The alpha  subunit of hCG is similar to the alpha subunit of FSH, LH, and  thyrotropin. The free beta subunit of hCG differs from the others in  that it has a 30–amino acid tailpiece at the COOH terminus. Free beta  subunits are degraded by macrophage enzymes in the kidney to make a beta  subunit core fragment, which is primarily detected in urine samples.</p>
<p>The  beta-hCG subunit is present in the syncytial layer of the blastomere.  Hyperglycosylated hCG is a form of hCG produced by invasive  cytotrophoblast cells in early pregnancy and implantation. hCG messenger  RNA is detectable in the blastomeres of 6- to 8-cell embryos at 2 days  but cannot be isolated in culture medium until 6 days. Detection in  maternal serum and urine is evident only after implantation and vascular  communication has been established with the decidua by the  syncytiotrophoblast 8-10 days after conception.</p>
<p>hCG is present in  the maternal circulation as either an intact dimer, alpha or beta  subunit, and degraded form, or beta core fragment. Intact and free beta  subunit are initially the predominant forms of hCG, with the beta core  fragment emerging as the predominant form in the fifth week after  conception. Additionally, intact and free beta subunit have the most  day-to-day variability and are transiently undetectable even 10 days  after detection of pregnancy.<sup>[8 ]</sup>Optimally, tests used for  early pregnancy detection should be able to recognize all forms of  intact hCG, including the free beta subunit and the beta core fragment.</p>
<p>Currently,  4 main hCG assays are used: (1) radioimmunoassay, (2) immunoradiometric  assay, (3) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and (4)  fluoroimmunoassay. These assays are highly specific for hCG with  antibodies directed against 2 or more isotopes on the intact hCG  molecule. Time of detection is related to the sensitivity of the assay  being used. Most current pregnancy tests have sensitivity to  approximately 25 mIU/mL. Urine devices must be formulated to detect  hyperglycosylated hCG, which is the key molecule in early pregnancy.</p>
<p>Characteristics  of each hCG assay are listed as follows:</p>
<ul>
<li>Radioimmunoassay
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity  &#8211; 5 mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time to complete &#8211; 4 hours</li>
<li>Postconception  age when first positive &#8211; 10-18 days</li>
<li>Gestational age when first  positive &#8211; 3-4 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Immunoradiometric assay (more  sensitive)
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity &#8211; 150 mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time to complete &#8211; 30  minutes</li>
<li>Postconception age when first positive &#8211; 18-22 days</li>
<li>Gestational  age when first positive &#8211; 4 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Immunoradiometric  assay (less sensitive)
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity &#8211; 1500 mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time to  complete &#8211; 2 minutes</li>
<li>Postconception age when first positive &#8211;  25-28 days</li>
<li>Gestational age when first positive &#8211; 5 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Enzyme-linked  immunosorbent assay (more sensitive)
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity &#8211; 25 mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time  to complete &#8211; 80 minutes</li>
<li>Postconception age when first positive  &#8211; 14-17 days</li>
<li>Gestational age when first positive &#8211; 3.5 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Enzyme-linked  immunosorbent assay (less sensitive)
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity &#8211; Less than 50  mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time to complete &#8211; 5-15 minutes</li>
<li>Postconception  age when first positive &#8211; 18-22 days</li>
<li>Gestational age when first  positive &#8211; 4 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Fluoroimmunoassay
<ul>
<li>Sensitivity  &#8211; 1 mIU/mL</li>
<li>Time to complete &#8211; 2-3 hours</li>
<li>Postconception  age when first positive &#8211; 14-17 days</li>
<li>Gestational age when first  positive &#8211; 3.5 weeks</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p>Dimeric hCG and both the  alpha and beta subunits are produced in the pituitary gland of  nonpregnant females and are released in association with LH. Although  levels are much higher in postmenopausal women (110 pg/mL vs 10 pg/mL),  they are still below the sensitivity of the most sensitive clinical  assays (approximately 1 mIU/mL) used in pregnancy monitoring.</p>
<p><strong>Serial hCG monitoring</strong></p>
<p>hCG is detectable in the serum  of approximately 5% of patients 8 days after conception and in more  than 98% of patients by day 11. At 4 weeks&#8217; gestation (18-22 d  postconception), the dimer and beta subunit hCG doubling times are  approximately 2.2 days (standard deviation ± 0.8 d) and fall to 3.5 days  (standard deviation ± 1.2 d) by 9 weeks&#8217; gestation. levels peak at  10-12 weeks&#8217; gestation and then begin to decline rapidly until another,  more gradual rise begins at 22 weeks&#8217; gestation, which continues until  term.</p>
<p>The initial rate of rise, measured by serial quantitative  hCG testing, is important in the monitoring of early complicated  pregnancies that have yet to be documented as viable and/or  intrauterine. Failure to achieve the projected rate of rise may suggest  an ectopic pregnancy or spontaneous abortion. hCG doubling times are  subject to fluctuations of intact hCG during early pregnancy, so  interpretation of these values must take into account the assays used  and the clinical picture.</p>
<p>In one study, 200 women who received a  diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy by serial hCG were evaluated. Of no  surprise, the rise in hCG values in women with ectopic pregnancies was  slower than those with viable pregnancies and the decline of hCG values  in women with ectopic pregnancies was slower than for those with  completed spontaneous abortion. However, 20.8% of women with ectopic  pregnancies presented with a rise in hCG values similar to the minimal  rise for women with a viable gestation, and 8% of women presented with a  fall in hCG values similar to women with a completed spontaneous  abortion.<sup>[9 ]</sup>Several over studies such as this one  demonstrate that a single pattern of hCG does not exist for abnormal  early pregnancy, so caution must be taken in interpreting serial hCG  values in the evaluation of early pregnancy.</p>
<p>On the other hand, an  abnormally high level or accelerated rise can prompt investigation into  the possibility of molar pregnancy, multiple gestations, or chromosomal  abnormalities.</p>
<p><strong>False positive hCG results</strong></p>
<p>As with  most tests, hCG test results can be either falsely negative or positive.  The prevalence of false-positive serum hCG results is low, with  estimates ranging from 0.01-2%. False-positive serum hCG results are  usually due to interference by non-hCG substances or the detection of  pituitary hCG. Some examples of non-hCG substances that can cause  false-positive results include human LH, antianimal immunoglobulin  antibodies, rheumatoid factor, heterophile antibodies, and binding  proteins. Most false-positive results are characterized by serum levels  that are generally less than 1000 mIU/mL and usually less than 150  mIU/mL. The median serum concentration for patients with false-positive  results reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from  1985-2001 is 75 mIU/mL. Also, note that only 2 (0.74%) of 271 separate  hCG determinations in undiluted sera in both the FDA database and the  literature were greater than 1000 mIU/mL.</p>
<p>Several methods are  available to help detect false-positive serum hCG results. The first  step is to check urine hCG levels. The free beta-hCG subunit is further  degraded in the kidney to a beta subunit core fragment that has less  than half the molecular weight of the free beta subunit. Some of the  substances that can cause serum false-positive results have much higher  molecular weights that are not easily filtered through the renal  glomeruli; therefore, they do not produce a positive urine hCG result.  Other steps to verify or disprove a positive serum hCG result include  retesting the same specimen, testing a new specimen, taking serial  measurements to look for a rise, performing serial dilutions to look for  linearity, and testing using a different method.</p>
<p>The five potential  sources of positive hCG results outside of pregnancy are described  below:<sup>[10 ]</sup></p>
<ul>
<li>Phantom hCG
<ul>
<li>Caused by  heterophilic antibodies that bind the capture and labeled antibodies  together without hCG being present</li>
<li>Antibody production results  from exposure to animals used to produce antibodies used in assay</li>
<li>Rule  out with sensitive urine assay, as these antibodies do not cross into  urine</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Pituitary hCG
<ul>
<li>Stimulated by  gonadotropin-releasing hormone; suppressed by gonadotropin-releasing  hormone agonist and estrogen/progestin therapy</li>
<li>Can be detected  in postmenopausal women due to increased GnRH secretion (Snyder et al  propose that postmenopausal women should have a higher cutoff for a  negative hCG of 14 IU/L<sup>[11 ]</sup>)</li>
<li>Diagnosed by  administering oral contraceptive pills, which should suppress hCG levels</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Exogenous  administration of hCG
<ul>
<li>Used by some centers to aid in weight loss  by intramuscular or oral administration</li>
<li>Repeat hCG assays  should be negative if exogenous administration is discontinued for at  least 24 hours</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Trophoblastic neoplasm &#8211; Consists of  pregnancy, gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN), and placental site  trophoblastic tumors (PSTTs)
<ul>
<li>Gestational trophoblastic  neoplasia
<ul>
<li>Quiescent &#8211; Constant, low levels of hCG without  evidence of primary or metastatic malignancy; premalignant state;  resistant to chemotherapy and surgery; follow with frequent hCG levels  and if found to be rising, consider active gestational trophoblastic  neoplasia</li>
<li>Active &#8211; Invasive cytotrophoblasts produce  hyperglycosylated hCG found only in early pregnancy and invasive  gestational trophoblastic neoplasia; thus, hyperglycosylated hCG or  invasive trophoblastic antigen can be measured to rule in active disease</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Placental  site trophoblastic tumors &#8211; Diagnosed with low-level hCG in combination  with intramyometrial lesions on imaging</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Nontrophoblastic  neoplasm &#8211; Can be secreted by different cancers, (eg, testicular,  bladder, uterine, lung, liver, pancreas, stomach)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>False-negative  hCG results</strong><br />
False-negative hCG test results usually  involve urine and are due to the qualitative nature of the test. Reasons  for a negative test result may include an hCG concentration below the  sensitivity threshold of the specific test being used, a miscalculation  in the onset of the missed menses, or delayed menses from early  pregnancy loss. Delayed ovulation or delayed implantation are other  reasons for low hCG concentrations at the time of testing, which yields a  false-negative result.</p>
<p>At least 1 case report in the literature  is notable when considering false-negative urine hCG test results. A  37-year-old woman presented to an emergency department in hypovolemic  shock 13 weeks after her last menstrual period. She had a dilation and  curettage for an intrauterine pregnancy 8 weeks before presentation. Two  different samples yielded negative qualitative urine pregnancy test  results. The third urine hCG test result was weakly positive, and, at  that time, her serum hCG level was 22,430 mIU/mL. She was diagnosed with  an interstitial ectopic pregnancy and underwent surgery, during which  approximately 2000 mL of free blood was found in her peritoneal cavity.  Interstitial pregnancies make up less than 3% of tubal pregnancies, but  they can be present in conjunction with negative urine pregnancy test  results.</p>
<p><strong>Progesterone</strong></p>
<p>Measuring serum  progesterone may be a useful adjunct for evaluating abnormal early  pregnancy. Serum progesterone is a reflection of progesterone production  by the corpus luteum, which is stimulated by a viable pregnancy.  Measurement of serum progesterone is inexpensive and can reliably  predict pregnancy prognosis. Currently, radioimmunoassays and  fluoroimmunoassays are available that can be completed in 3-4 hours. A  dipstick ELISA that can determine a serum progesterone level of less  than 15 ng/mL is also on the market. ELISA is helpful as a screening  tool for at-risk populations because progesterone levels of greater than  15 ng/mL make ectopic pregnancy unlikely.<sup>[12 ]</sup></p>
<p>Viable  intrauterine pregnancy can be diagnosed with 97.5% sensitivity if the  serum progesterone levels are greater than 25 ng/mL (&gt;79.5 nmol/L).  Conversely, finding serum progesterone levels of less than 5 ng/mL  (&lt;15.9 nmol/L) can aid in the diagnosis of a nonviable pregnancy with  100% sensitivity. Finding serum progesterone levels of less than 5  ng/mL allows diagnostic evaluation of the uterus in a stable patient,  even if an ectopic pregnancy cannot be distinguished from a spontaneous  intrauterine abortion beforehand. In the event that the serum  progesterone level is 5-25 ng/mL, further testing using US, additional  hormonal assays, or serial examinations is warranted to establish the  viability of the pregnancy. Algorithms using serum progesterone are  available for the evaluation and management of patients with abnormal  early pregnancy.</p>
<p><strong>Early pregnancy factor</strong></p>
<p>The  early pregnancy factor (EPF) assay may be useful in the future. EPF is a  poorly defined immunosuppressive protein that has been isolated in  maternal serum shortly after conception and is the earliest available  marker to indicate fertilization. It is detectable in the serum 36-48  hours after fertilization, peaks early in the first trimester, and is  almost undetectable at term. EPF also appears within 48 hours of  successful in vitro fertilization embryo transfers. EPF cannot be  detected 24 hours after delivery or at the termination of an ectopic or  intrauterine pregnancy. EPF is also undetectable in many ectopic  pregnancies and spontaneous abortions, indicating that an inability to  identify EPF during pregnancy heralds a poor prognosis.</p>
<p>EPF has  limited clinical applications at this time because the molecule is  difficult to isolate. Detection of EPF currently relies on a complex and  unwieldy assay termed the rosette inhibition test. EPF may play a more  prominent role in the future as the diagnosis of conception prior to  implantation elucidates new strategies for contraception, highly  accurate dating, and advanced genetic studies.</p>
<p><strong>Home  pregnancy tests</strong></p>
<p>At least 25 different home pregnancy  tests are currently marketed in the United States. These tests now use  the modern immunometric assay. Most of these tests claim &#8220;99% accuracy&#8221;  or some other similar statements on the packaging or product insert.  Most of the tests also now advertise that they can be used &#8220;as early as  the day of the missed menstrual period.&#8221; Several home pregnancy tests  actually instruct that they may be used 3-4 days before the time of the  missed period.</p>
<p>The accuracy claims are derived from an FDA  guideline that refers to the test&#8217;s ability to identify approximately  100 nonpregnant urine samples supplemented with intact hCG from a  similar number of urine samples not supplemented with hCG. The broad  99%-accuracy statement is made for tests with sensitivities for hCG  concentrations ranging from 25 mIU/mL (fairly sensitive) to tests with  sensitivities of 100 mIU/mL (less sensitive). The 99%-accuracy statement  in reference to the FDA guideline is misleading in that it has no  bearing on the ability of the home pregnancy test to detect early  pregnancy.</p>
<p>Home pregnancy tests are most commonly used in the week  after the missed menstrual period (fourth completed gestational week).  Urine hCG values are extremely variable at this time and can range from  12 mIU/mL to greater than 2500 mIU/mL. This variability continues into  the fifth week, when values have been shown to range from 13 mIU/mL to  greater than 6000 mIU/mL. Both weeks have a percentage of urine hCG  values that is below the sensitivities of detection for common home  pregnancy tests (range 25-100 mIU/mL).</p>
<p>Several studies have tested  different home pregnancy tests for sensitivity and accuracy claims.</p>
<ul>
<li>One  study tested 18 different home pregnancy tests at 5 different hCG  concentrations (0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 mIU/mL). No difference in  sensitivity was detected between tests that had longer reading times  (usually approximately 5 min) compared with those with shorter reading  times (1 min). Clearly positive results were only found in 44% of the  brands when tested at the highest hCG concentration (100 mIU/mL). The  sensitivity was improved to 83% of brands tested at 100 mIU/mL when a  faintly discernible line was also considered a positive result. Test  sensitivity was also increased when reading times were extended to 10  minutes. Overall, 100% accuracy was only achieved in all 18 brands  tested when the highest hCG concentration (100 mIU/ml) was used, an  extended reading time was used, and faintly discernible results were  included as positive.</li>
<li>Another study evaluated 7 home pregnancy  tests and found that despite the claims, the detection of pregnancy on  the day of missed period varied from 16-95%, and some devices were  faulty (defined as devices failing to yield a band in the control  window).</li>
<li>Other studies have found that home pregnancy tests with  digital reading may offer significant benefits over traditional  nondigital tests.</li>
</ul>
<p>The limitations of these tests must be  understood so that pregnancy detection is not significantly delayed.  Early pregnancy detection allows for the commencement of prenatal care,  potential medication changes, lifestyle changes to promote a healthy  pregnancy (appropriate diet; avoidance of alcohol, tobacco, and certain  medications), or early pregnancy termination if desired.</p>
<p><strong>Serum  hCG values in infertility</strong></p>
<p>Serum hCG values for the diagnosis  of early pregnancy in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization–embryo  transfer (IVF-ET) have been studied.<sup>[13 ]</sup> Serum hCG levels 14  days after embryo transfer correlate with pregnancy outcome. In a study  of 111 patients with positive quantitative hCG levels 14 days after  embryo transfer, the following pregnancy outcomes were observed:</p>
<ul>
<li>Levels  &lt;300 mIU/mL, ongoing pregnancy rate was 9%</li>
<li>Levels 300-600  mIU/mL, ongoing pregnancy rate was 50%</li>
<li>Levels &gt;600 mIU/mL,  multiple pregnancy rate was 100%</li>
</ul>
<p>Therefore, in this  particular population, quantitative assay results can be used to guide  counseling and further evaluation.</p>
<h2>Ultrasonography</h2>
<p><a id="Ultrasonography" name="Ultrasonography"> </a>With  the advent of transvaginal ultrasonography (TVUS), the diagnosis of  pregnancy can be made even earlier than is possible with transabdominal  ultrasonography (TAUS). US has long been used in uncomplicated  pregnancies for dating and as a screening examination for fetal  anomalies. US is not typically used to diagnose pregnancy unless the  patient presents with vaginal bleeding or abdominal pain early in  gestation or is a high-risk obstetric patient. TVUS is the most accurate  means of confirming intrauterine pregnancy and gestational age during  the early first trimester.</p>
<p>TVUS has several advantages over TAUS  during early pregnancy. TVUS can help detect signs of intrauterine  pregnancy approximately 1 week earlier than TAUS. Patients are not  required to have a full bladder and are not required to endure  uncomfortable pressure on the abdominal wall from the external probe.  TVUS is also better for patients who are obese or those who guard during  TAUS. One disadvantage is that some patients are anxious about the  transvaginal probe and may object to its insertion.</p>
<p>Vaginal probes  are typically of higher frequency (5-8 MHz) than abdominal probes (3-5  MHz). The higher frequency allows for better resolution of the image but  less penetration of the signal. Also, practice is necessary for  familiarization with the orientation on the US monitor when performing  TVUS.</p>
<p>The earliest structure identified is the (GS). The GS can be  seen on TVUS images by 4-5 weeks&#8217; gestation and grows at a rate of 1  mm/d in early gestation. By 5.5-6 weeks&#8217; gestation, a double-decidual  sign can be seen, which is the GS surrounded by the thickened decidua.  The presence of an early GS can be confused with a small collection of  fluid or blood or the pseudo GS of an ectopic pregnancy. Because of  this, the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy should not be made on the  basis of visualization of the GS alone.</p>
<p>The yolk sac can be  recognized by 4-5 weeks&#8217; gestation and is seen until approximately 10  weeks&#8217; gestation. The yolk sac is a small sphere with a hypoechoic  center and is located within the GS (see Media file 2).</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the..." width="800" height="645" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Pregnancy  diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to     the yolk sac as seen within the gestational sac (GS). The yolk     sac is usually identified before the GS is larger than 10 mm.     Likewise, if the yolk sac is larger than 7 mm without signs of     a developing fetal pole, the chance of an abnormal pregnancy is     increased.</h4>
<p>Observing a GS that is larger 10 mm without a  yolk sac is rare, and if this is observed, it most likely represents an  abnormal pregnancy (see Media file 3).</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2476.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. This is a gestational sac (G..." width="800" height="569" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Pregnancy  diagnosis. This is a gestational sac     (GS) that measures approximately 2 X 3 cm, without evidence of     a yolk sac. When the GS is larger than 10 mm and no yolk sac is     identified, an abnormal pregnancy is likely. This particular     situation is referred to as a blighted ovum or an anembryonic     pregnancy.</h4>
<p>Likewise, a yolk sac larger than 7 mm without  evidence of a developing fetal pole suggests a nonviable pregnancy. The  diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy can be made once the yolk sac is  present, which also excludes ectopic pregnancy, except in the rare  instance of heterotopic pregnancy. A heterotopic pregnancy, an  intrauterine pregnancy, and an ectopic pregnancy during the same  gestation was once thought to be extremely rare but has now been shown  to be present in as many as 1 in 3000 pregnancies.The fetal or  embryonic pole is first seen on TVUS images at approximately 5-6 weeks&#8217;  gestation. It should always be seen by TVUS when the GS is larger than  18 mm or by TAUS when the GS is larger than 2.5 cm. The fetal pole is a  linear hyperechoic structure that grows at approximately 1 mm/d.</p>
<p>Cardiac  motion can sometimes be identified in a 2- to 3-mm embryo but is almost  always present when the embryo grows to 5 mm or longer. At 5-6 weeks&#8217;  gestation, the fetal heart rate ranges from 100-115 beats per minute.  The heart rate will steadily increase to a mean of 140 beats per minute  by 9 weeks&#8217; gestational age.</p>
<h2>Ultrasonography and Human  Chorionic       Gonadotropin</h2>
<p><a id="UltrasonographyandHumanChorionicGonadotropin" name="UltrasonographyandHumanChorionicGonadotropin"> </a>Ultrasonography becomes  even more useful for the diagnosis of early pregnancy and for  identifying abnormal pregnancies when it is used in conjunction with  assessing quantitative hCG levels. The identification of gestational  structures by ultrasonography correlates with specific levels of hCG,  termed discriminatory levels. A discriminatory level is the level of hCG  at which the structure in question should always be identified.</p>
<p>The  GS has been identified by TVUS with hCG levels as low as 300 mIU/mL,  and most experienced TVUS operators should visualize the GS when levels  are approximately 1000 mIU/mL. The discriminatory level for the GS is  approximately 3600 mIU/mL, and if it is not seen at this point, other  pathology must be excluded. Many use a more conservative discriminatory  level for the GS, at 2000 mIU/mL by TVUS and 3600 mIU/ml by TAUS, and  will begin to rule out pathology if the GS is not seen. The adnexa  should be scanned for an ectopic pregnancy, and sonograms and hCG levels  should be followed until a diagnosis is made. Furthermore, one study  showed that all viable intrauterine pregnancies had a GS identified by  TAUS for hCG levels of greater than 6500 mIU/mL.</p>
<p>The usefulness of  TVUS evaluation when the hCG is less than 1000 mIU/mL has been debated.  One study showed that valuable information can still be garnered in  women presenting for emergent TVUS with an hCG level of less than 1000  mIU/mL. In this study, approximately 13% of the abnormal intrauterine  pregnancies and 39% of the ectopic pregnancies were identified by TVUS.  Ultrasonography should not be delayed purely on the basis of hCG levels.<sup>[14  ]</sup></p>
<p>Other structures are also anticipated in correlation with  specific hCG levels. The yolk sac (see Media file 2) is commonly  observed with an hCG level of approximately 2500 mIU/mL, although it may  not be identified until levels are much higher. The embryonic pole  usually becomes evident at a level of approximately 5000 mIU/mL, and the  fetal heartbeat can be seen in the vast majority of normal gestations  when the hCG level reaches 10,000 mIU/mL.</p>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the..." width="800" height="645" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Pregnancy  diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to     the yolk sac as seen within the gestational sac (GS). The yolk     sac is usually identified before the GS is larger than 10 mm.     Likewise, if the yolk sac is larger than 7 mm without signs of     a developing fetal pole, the chance of an abnormal pregnancy is     increased.</h4>
<h2>Conclusion</h2>
<p><a id="Conclusion" name="Conclusion"> </a>The diagnosis of  pregnancy can be made by several methods. Normocyclic women who present  with amenorrhea and typical history and physical examination findings  have the classic presentation and can be diagnosed with a viable  intrauterine pregnancy if they progress appropriately. Currently, most  women are diagnosed with pregnancy after a missed menstrual cycle and a  positive urine or serum hCG finding. The pregnancy is diagnosed as  viable with serial examinations and normal pregnancy development, a  normal result after dating ultrasonography, or a positive finding of  fetal heart tones using Doppler studies.</p>
<p>Women who are considered  high-risk or those who present with abdominal pain or vaginal bleeding  in early gestation are more likely to be evaluated with ultrasonography  and additional hormonal assays. A number of different combinations can  aid in the diagnosis of a viable intrauterine pregnancy. The physician  must ascertain what is most appropriate at the time of patient  presentation.</p>
<p>For excellent patient education resources, visit  eMedicine&#8217;s Pregnancy and Reproduction Center. Also, see eMedicine&#8217;s  patient education articles Home Pregnancy Test, Ectopic Pregnancy, Birth  Control Overview, and Birth Control FAQs.</p>
<h2>Multimedia</h2>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2477.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex  m..." width="800" height="616" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Media  file 1: 					Pregnancy diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex     mass in the adnexa (labeled EP). It was found to be an ectopic     pregnancy at the time of surgery.</h4>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the..." width="800" height="645" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Media  file 2: 					Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to     the yolk sac as seen within the gestational sac (GS). The yolk     sac is usually identified before the GS is larger than 10 mm.     Likewise, if the yolk sac is larger than 7 mm without signs of     a developing fetal pole, the chance of an abnormal pregnancy is     increased.</h4>
<blockquote><p><img src="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2476.jpg" border="1" alt="Pregnancy diagnosis.  This is a gestational sac (G..." width="800" height="569" /></p></blockquote>
<h4>Media  file 3: 					Pregnancy diagnosis. This is a gestational sac     (GS) that measures approximately 2 X 3 cm, without evidence of     a yolk sac. When the GS is larger than 10 mm and no yolk sac is     identified, an abnormal pregnancy is likely. This particular     situation is referred to as a blighted ovum or an anembryonic     pregnancy.</h4>
<h2>References</h2>
<ol>
<li>Paspulati  RM, Bhatt S, Nour SG. Sonographic evaluation of first-trimester  bleeding. <em>Radiol Clin North Am</em>. Mar 2004;42(2):297-314. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15136018">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Dart  RG. Role of pelvic ultrasonography in evaluation of symptomatic  first-trimester pregnancy. <em>Ann Emerg Med</em>. Mar 1999;33(3):310-20. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/10036346">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Seeber  BE, Barnhart KT. Suspected ectopic pregnancy. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. February  2006;107(2):399-413. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16449130">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li><em>Female  Sterilization: Risk of Ectopic Pregnancy After Tubal Sterilization Fact  Sheet</em>. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and  Prevention; 2008. <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/UnintendedPregnancy/EctopicPreg_factsheet.htm">[Full Text]</a>.</li>
<li>Speroff  L, Fritz MA. <em>Clinical Gynecologic Endocrinology and Infertility</em>. 7<sup>th</sup> ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins; 2005.</li>
<li>Berek  JS, Adashi EY, Hillard PA. <em>Novak&#8217;s Gynecology</em>. 14th. Baltimore,  MD: Lippincott Williams &amp; Wilkins; 2006.</li>
<li>Paul M,  Schaff E, Nichols M. The roles of clinical assessment, human chorionic  gonadotropin assays, and ultrasonography in medical abortion practice. <em>Am  J Obstet Gynecol</em>. Aug 2000;183(2 Suppl):S34-43. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/10944368">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>McChesney  R, Wilcox AJ, O&#8217;Connor JF, et al. Intact HCG, free HCG beta subunit and  HCG beta core fragment: longitudinal patterns in urine during early  pregnancy. <em>Hum Reprod</em>. Apr 2005;20(4):928-35. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15665026">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Silva  C, Sammel MD, Zhou L, et al. Human chorionic gonadotropin profile for  women with ectopic pregnancy. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. Mar 2006;107(3):605-10. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16507931">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Olson  TG, Barnes AA, King JK. Elevated hCG Outside of Pregnancy – Diagnostic  Considerations and Laboratory Evaluation. <em>Obstet Gynecol Survey</em>. Oct  2007;62(10):669-74. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/2665494">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Snyder  JA, Haymond S, Parvin CA, et al. Diagnostic considerations in the  measurement of human chorionic gonadotropin in aging women. <em>Clin Chem</em>. Oct 2005;51(10):1830-5. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16099935">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Davies  S, Byrn F, Cole LA. Human chorionic gonadotropin testing for early  pregnancy viability and complications. <em>Clin Lab Med</em>. Jun 2003;23(2):257-64,  vii. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/12848444">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Guth  B, Hudelson J, Higbie J, et al. Predictive value of hCG level 14 days  after embryo transfer. <em>J Assist Reprod Genet</em>. Jan 1995;12(1):13-4. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/7580002">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Dart  RG, Kaplan B, Cox C. Transvaginal ultrasound in patients with low  beta-human chorionic gonadotropin values: how often is the study  diagnostic?. <em>Ann Emerg Med</em>. Aug 1997;30(2):135-40. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/9250634">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Ankum  WM, Van der Veen F, Hamerlynck JV, et al. Suspected ectopic pregnancy.  What to do when human chorionic gonadotropin levels are below the  discriminatory zone. <em>J Reprod Med</em>. Jul 1995;40(7):525-8. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/7473443">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Barnhart  K, Esposito M, Coutifaris C. An update on the medical treatment of  ectopic pregnancy. <em>Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am</em>. Sep 2000;27(3):653-67,  viii. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/10958010">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Barnhart  KT, Sammel MD, Rinaudo PF, et al. Symptomatic patients with an early  viable intrauterine pregnancy: HCG curves redefined. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. Jul 2004;104(1):50-5. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/15229000">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Barnhart  KT, Simhan H, Kamelle SA. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound above and  below the beta-hCG discriminatory zone. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. Oct 1999;94(4):583-7. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/10511363">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Braunstein  GD. False-positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin results: causes,  characteristics, and recognition. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. Jul 2002;187(1):217-24. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/12114913">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Bree  RL, Edwards M, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Transvaginal sonography in the  evaluation of normal early pregnancy: correlation with HCG level. <em>AJR  Am J Roentgenol</em>. Jul 1989;153(1):75-9. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/2660539">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Cole  LA, Khanlian SA, Sutton JM, et al. Accuracy of home pregnancy tests at  the time of missed menses. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. Jan 2004;190(1):100-5. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/14749643">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Cole  LA, Sutton-Riley JM, Khanlian SA, et al. Sensitivity of  over-the-counter pregnancy tests: comparison of utility and marketing  messages. <em>J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)</em>. Sep-Oct 2005;45(5):608-15. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/16295647">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Goldstein  SR, Snyder JR, Watson C, et al. Very early pregnancy detection with  endovaginal ultrasound. <em>Obstet Gynecol</em>. Aug 1988;72(2):200-4. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/3292977">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Kim  SW, Ha YR, Chung SP, et al. Ruptured interstitial pregnancy presenting  with negative beta-hCG and hypovolemic shock. <em>Am J Emerg Med</em>. Oct 2003;21(6):511. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/14574668">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Klee  GG. Interferences in hormone immunoassays. <em>Clinics in Laboratory  Medicine</em>. Mar 2004;24, Number 1.</li>
<li>Moore KL, Persaud  TVN. <em>The Developing Human: Clinically Oriented Embryology</em>. 5<sup>th</sup> ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders; 1993:14-69.</li>
<li>Nyberg  DA, Laing FC, Filly RA. Threatened abortion: sonographic distinction of  normal and abnormal gestation sacs. <em>Radiology</em>. Feb 1986;158(2):397-400. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/3510445">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Nyberg  DA, Mack LA, Harvey D, et al. Value of the yolk sac in evaluating early  pregnancies. <em>J Ultrasound Med</em>. Mar 1988;7(3):129-35. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/3280823">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Romero  R, Kadar N, Copel JA, et al. The value of serial human chorionic  gonadotropin testing as a diagnostic tool in ectopic pregnancy. <em>Am J  Obstet Gynecol</em>. Aug 1986;155(2):392-4. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/3740163">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Timor-Tritsch  IE, Yeh MN, Peisner DB, et al. The use of transvaginal ultrasonography  in the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy. <em>Am J Obstet Gynecol</em>. Jul 1989;161(1):157-61. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/2665494">[Medline]</a>.</li>
<li>Tomlinson  C, Marshall J, Ellis JE. Comparison of accuracy and certainty of  results of six home pregnancy tests available over-the-counter. <em>Curr  Med Res Opin</em>. Jun 2008;24(6):1645-9. <a href="http://www.medscape.com/medline/abstract/18457603">[Medline]</a>.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Keywords</h2>
<p>conception,  parturition, pregnancy, gestation, pregnancy signs, pregnancy symptoms,  Hegar sign, Chadwick sign, ectopic pregnancy, abnormal pregnancy,  spontaneous abortion, positive pregnancy test, negative pregnancy test,  pregnancy test, home pregnancy test, false-positive hCG, false-negative  hCG</p>
<h2>Contributor Information and Disclosures</h2>
<h4>Author</h4>
<p><strong>Andrea D Shields, MD,</strong> Director,  Antenatal Counseling and Diagnostic Center, Department of  Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Wilford Hall Medical Center; Associate Faculty,  Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uniformed Services University  of the Health Sciences<br />
Andrea D Shields, MD is a member of the  following medical societies: Alpha Omega Alpha, American College of  Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Institute of Ultrasound in  Medicine, American Medical Association, Association of Women Surgeons,  and Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Medical Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Bruce A Meyer, MD, MBA,</strong> Vice President for  Medical Affairs, Associate Dean for Health System Affairs and Director  of the Faculty Practice Plan, Professor, Department of Obstetrics and  Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School<br />
Bruce A  Meyer, MD, MBA is a member of the following medical societies: American  College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of  Physician Executives, American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,  Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Massachusetts  Medical Society, Medical Group Management Association, and Society for  Maternal-Fetal Medicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Pharmacy Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Francisco Talavera, PharmD, PhD,</strong> Senior  Pharmacy Editor, eMedicine<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>CME Editor</h4>
<p><strong>Frederick B Gaupp, MD,</strong> Consulting Staff,  Department of Family Practice, Hancock Medical Center<br />
Frederick B  Gaupp, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American  Academy of Family Physicians<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
<h4>Chief Editor</h4>
<p><strong>David Chelmow, MD,</strong> Professor of Obstetrics  and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine; Program Director,  Tufts University Affiliated Hospitals OB/GYN Residency Program; Chair,  Tufts University Health Sciences Campus Institutional Review Board; Vice  Chair for Research and Education, Dept of OB/GYN, Tufts Medical Center<br />
David  Chelmow, MD is a member of the following medical societies: American  College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American Medical  Association, Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics,  Massachusetts Medical Society, Phi Beta Kappa, Sigma Xi, Society for  Gynecologic Investigation, and Society for Medical Decision Making<br />
Disclosure: Nothing to disclose.</p>
</div>
<p><strong> Acknowledgments </strong></p>
<p><a id="Acknowledgments" name="Acknowledgments"> </a></p>
<p>The  authors and editors of eMedicine gratefully acknowledge the  contributions of previous authors Randle L Likes, DO and Eric  Rittenhouse, MD, FACOG to the development and writing of this article.</p>
<p><strong> Further Reading</strong></p>
<p><!-- FOOTER--> <!-- Copyright --></p>
<p id="printcopyright">© 1994-// 2010  by Medscape.<br />
All Rights Reserved<br />
(http://www.medscape.com/public/copyright)</p>
<br />  <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gocomments/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/comments/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godelicious/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/delicious/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gofacebook/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/facebook/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gotwitter/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/twitter/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/gostumble/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/stumble/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/godigg/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/digg/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <a rel="nofollow" href="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/goreddit/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/"><img alt="" border="0" src="http://feeds.wordpress.com/1.0/reddit/danilatos.wordpress.com/89/" /></a> <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=danilatos.wordpress.com&amp;blog=3927841&amp;post=89&amp;subd=danilatos&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danilatos.wordpress.com/2010/07/17/pregnancy-diagnosis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/2de800085768360616818c26420217fd?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">danilatos</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2477.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex m...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2476.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. This is a gestational sac (G...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2477.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. Sonogram showing a complex  m...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2478.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis. The arrow is pointing to the...</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://img.medscape.com/pi/emed/ckb/obstetrics_gynecology/252558-262591-2476.jpg" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Pregnancy diagnosis.  This is a gestational sac (G...</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
